Where does all the
war, racism, terrorism, violence, and cruelty that's so
endemic to human civilization come from? Why do humans
exploit and massacre each other so regularly? Why is our
species so violence-prone? To answer these questions we
would do well to think about our exploitation and slaughter
of animals and its effect on human civilization. Could it be
that we oppress and kill each other so readily because our
abuse and slaughter of animals has desensitized us to the
suffering and death of others?
The "domestication" of animals--the
exploitation of goats, sheep, cattle, and other animals for
their meat, milk, hides, and labor that began in the Near
East about 11,000 years ago--changed human history. In
earlier hunter-gatherer societies there had been some sense
of kinship between humans and animals, reflected in totemism
and myths which portrayed animals, or part-animal part-human
creatures, as creators and progenitors of the human race.
However, mankind crossed the Rubicon when Near Eastern
herdsmen and farmers started castrating, hobbling, and
branding captive animals to control their mobility, diet,
growth, and reproductive lives. To distance themselves
emotionally from the cruelty they inflicted, they adopted
mechanisms of detachment, rationalization, denial, and
euphemism, and in the process became a harder, more ruthless
lot.
In 1917 Sigmund Freud put the issue in
perspective when he wrote: "In the course of his development
towards culture man acquired a dominating position over his
fellow-creatures in the animal kingdom. Not content with
this supremacy, however, he began to place a gulf between
his nature and theirs. He denied the possession of reason to
them, and to himself he attributed an immortal soul, and
made claims to a divine descent which permitted him to
annihilate the bond of community between him and the animal
kingdom."
The domination, control, and manipulation
that characterizes the way humans treat animals who come
under their control has set the tone and served as a model
for the way humans treat each other. The
enslavement/domestication of animals paved the way for human
slavery. As Karl Jacoby writes, slavery was "little more
than the extension of domestication to humans."
In the first civilizations that emerged
in the river valleys of ancient Egypt, Mesopotamia, India,
and China, the exploitation of animals for food, milk,
hides, and labor was so firmly established that these
civilizations sanctified the notion that animals existed
solely for their benefit. That allowed humans to use, abuse,
and kill them with total impunity. It also led humans to
place other humans--captives, enemies, strangers, and those
who were different or disliked--on the other side of the
great divide where they were vilified as "beasts," "pigs,"
"dogs," "monkeys," "rats," and "vermin." Designating other
people as animals has always been an ominous development
because it sets them up for humiliation, exploitation, and
murder. As Leo Kuper writes in Genocide: Its Political
Use in the Twentieth Century, "the animal world has been
a particularly fertile source of metaphors of
dehumanization."
From Slaughterhouse to Death Camp
The relationship of
animal exploitation to the Holocaust is less apparent
than it is in the case of slavery, but there is a connection
nonetheless. Take the case of Henry Ford, whose impact on
the twentieth century began, metaphorically speaking, at an
American slaughterhouse and ended at Auschwitz.
In his autobiography, My Life and Work
(1922), Ford revealed that his inspiration for assembly-line
production came from a visit he made as a young man to a
Chicago slaughterhouse. "I believe that this was the first
moving line ever installed. The idea [of the assembly line]
came in a general way from the overhead trolley that the
Chicago packers use in dressing beef." A Swift and Company
publication from that time described the division-of-labor
principle that so impressed Ford: "The slaughtered animals,
suspended head downward from a moving chain, or conveyor,
pass from workman to workman, each of whom performs some
particular step in the process." It was but one step from
the industrialized slaughter of animals to the assembly-line
mass murder of people. In J. M. Coetzee's novel, The
Lives of Animals, the protagonist Elizabeth Costello
tells her audience: "Chicago showed us the way; it was from
the Chicago stockyards that the Nazis learned how to process
bodies."
Most people are not aware of the central
role of the slaughterhouse in the history of American
industry. "Historians have deprived the packers of their
rightful title of mass-production pioneers," writes James
Barrett in his study of Chicago's packinghouse workers in
the early 1900s, "for it was not Henry Ford but Gustavus
Swift and Philip Armour who developed the assembly-line
technique that continues to symbolize the rationalized
organization of work."
Henry Ford, who was so impressed by the
efficient way meat packers slaughtered and dismantled
animals in Chicago, made his own unique contribution to the
slaughter of people in Europe. Not only did he develop the
assembly-line method that Germans used to kill Jews, but he
launched a vicious anti-Semitic campaign that helped make
the Holocaust happen.
In the early 1920s Ford's weekly
newspaper, the
Dearborn Independent, published a series of articles
based on the text of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion,
an anti-Semitic tract that had been circulating in Europe.
Ford published a book-length compilation of the articles
entitled The International Jew, which was translated
into most of the European languages and was widely
disseminated by anti-Semites, chief among them the German
publisher Theodor Fritsch, an early supporter of Hitler.
Thanks to a well-financed publicity campaign and the
prestige of the Ford name, The International Jew was
hugely successful both domestically and internationally.
The International Jew found its
most receptive audience in Germany where it was known as
The Eternal Jew. Ford was enormously popular in Germany.
When his autobiography went on sale there, it immediately
became the country's number one bestseller. In the early
1920s The Eternal Jew quickly became the bible of the
German anti-Semitism, with Fritsch's publishing house
printing six editions between 1920 and 1922.
After Ford's book came to the attention
of Hitler in Munich, he used a shortened version of it in
the Nazi propaganda war against the Jews of Germany. In 1923
a
Chicago Tribune correspondent in Germany reported that
Hitler's organization in Munich was "sending out Mr. Ford's
books by the carload." Baldur von Schirach, the leader of
the Hitler Youth movement and the son of an aristocratic
German father and American mother, said at the postwar
Nuremberg war crimes trial that he became a convinced
anti-Semite at age seventeen after reading The Eternal
Jew. "You have no idea what a great influence this book
had on the thinking of German youth. The younger generation
looked with envy to symbols of success and prosperity like
Henry Ford, and if he said the Jews were to blame, why
naturally we believed him."
Hitler regarded Ford as a comrade-in-arms
and kept a life-sized portrait of him on the wall next to
his desk in his office in Munich. In 1923 when Hitler heard
that Ford might run for President of the United States, he
told an American reporter, "I wish that I could send some of
my shock troops to Chicago and other big American cities to
help in the elections. We look to Heinrich Ford as the
leader of the growing Fascist movement in America. We have
just had his anti-Jewish articles translated and published.
The book is being circulated in millions throughout
Germany." Hitler praised Ford in Mein Kampf, the only
American to be singled out. In 1931, when a Detriot News
reporter asked Hitler what Ford's portrait on the wall meant
to him, Hitler said, "I regard Henry Ford as my
inspiration."
Although Ford stopped publishing the
Dearborn Independent in late 1927 and agreed to withdraw
The International Jew from the book market, copies of
The International Jew continued to circulate in large
numbers throughout Europe and Latin America. In Nazi Germany
the influence of The Eternal Jew continued to be
strong and lasting, with German anti-Semites advertising and
distributing it throughout the 1930s, often putting the
names of Henry Ford and Adolf Hitler together on the cover.
By late 1933, Fritsch had published twenty-nine editions,
each with a preface praising Ford for his "great service" to
America and the world for his attacks on the Jews.
In 1938, on the occasion of his
seventy-fifth birthday, Henry Ford, the great admirer of the
efficient way they slaughtered and cut up animals in
America, accepted the Grand Cross of the Supreme Order of
the German Eagle, the highest honor Nazi Germany could
bestow on a foreigner (Mussolini was one of the three other
foreigners to be so honored).
On January 7, 1942--exactly one month
after the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor that brought the
United States into the war--Ford wrote a letter to Sigmund
Livingston, national chairman of the Anti-Defamation League,
in which he expressed his disapproval of hatred "against the
Jew or any other racial or religious group." By that time,
Einsatzgruppen (German mobile killing squads) in the
East had already murdered hundreds of thousands of Jewish
men, women, and children, and the first German extermination
camp at Kulmhof (Chelmno) was already operational.
From Animal Breeding to Genocide
Another American contribution to Nazi Germany's Final
Solution--eugenics--was rooted in animal exploitation. The
breeding of domesticated animals--breeding the most
desirable and castrating and killing the rest--became the
model for American and German eugenic efforts to upgrade
their populations. America led the way with regard to forced
sterilizations, but Nazi Germany quickly caught up and went
on to euthanasia killings and genocide.
The desire to improve the hereditary
qualities of the human population had had its beginnings in
the 1860s when Francis Galton, an English scientist and
cousin of Charles Darwin, turned from meteorology to the
study of heredity (he coined the term "eugenics" in 1881).
By the end of the nineteenth century, genetic theories,
founded on the assumption that heredity was based on rigid
genetic patterns little influenced by social environment,
dominated scientific thought.
The eugenics movement in America began
with the creation of the American Breeders' Association
(ABA) in 1903. At the second meeting of the ABA in 1905, a
series of reports about the great success achieved in the
selective breeding of animals and plants prompted delegates
to ask why such techniques could not be applied to human
beings. The creation of a committee on Human Heredity, or
Eugenics, at the third ABA meeting in 1906 launched the
American eugenics movement in America.
Its leader was poultry researcher Charles
B. Davenport, who served as the director of the Eugenics
Record Office (ERO) at Cold Spring Harbor on Long Island in
New York. Davenport, who described eugenics as "the science
of the improvement of the human race by better breeding,"
looked forward to the time when a woman would no more accept
a man "without knowing his biologico-genealogical history"
than a stockbreeder would take "a sire for his colts or
calves who was without pedigree." He believed that "the most
progressive revolution in history" could be achieved if
"human matings could be placed upon the same high plane as
that of horse breeding." Sterilization began in
America in 1887, when the superintendent of the Cincinnati
Sanitarium published the first public recommendation for the
sterilization of criminals, both as a punishment and a way
to prevent further crime. Authorities used the same method
to sterilize male criminals that farmers used on their male
animals not selected for breeding--castration. Castration
was the preferred method used to sterilize male criminal
offenders until 1899, when vasectomy was adopted because it
was more practical.
Indiana passed the first state
sterilization law in 1907. By 1930 more than half the
American states passed laws that authorized the
sterilization of criminals and mentally ill people, with
California leading the way with more than sixty percent of
the country's forced sterilizations. By the 1930s compulsory
sterilization had widespread support in the United States,
with college presidents, clergymen, mental health workers,
and school principals among its strongest supporters. The
United States quickly became the model for other countries
that wanted to sterilize their "defectives." Denmark was the
first European country to pass such a law in 1929, followed
in rapid succession by other European nations.
In Germany, which passed its
sterilization law six months after the Nazis came to power,
eugenics established deep roots in medical and scientific
circles after World War I. In 1920 two respected
academics--Karl Binding, a widely published legal scholar,
and Alfred Hoche, a professor of psychiatry with a specialty
in neuropathology--published
Die Freigabe der Vernichtung lebensunwerten Lebens
(Authorization for the Destruction of Life Unworthy of Life).
In it they argued that German law should permit the mercy
killing of institutionalized patients who were
lebensunwert ("unworthy of life") and whose lives were
"without purpose" and a burden to their relatives and
society. Beginning in the 1920s, the Rockefeller Foundation
and other American foundations provided extensive financial
support for eugenics research in Germany. By the time the
Nazis came to power, more than twenty institutes for "racial
hygiene" had already been established at German
universities.
The Law on Preventing Hereditarily Ill
Progeny, which the Nazi government issued on July 14, 1933,
required the sterilization of patients suffering from mental
and physical disorders in state hospitals and nursing homes.
By then, the United States had already sterilized more than
15,000 people, most of them while they were incarcerated in
prisons or homes for the mentally ill. America's
sterilization laws made such a favorable impression on
Hitler and his followers that Nazi Germany looked to the
United States for racial leadership. Hitler took a special
interest in the progress of eugenics in the United States.
"I have studied with great interest the laws of several
American states concerning prevention of reproduction by
people whose progeny would, in all probability, be of no
value or be injurious to the racial stock." However, Nazi
Germany's sterilization efforts quickly surpassed those of
the United States. Estimates of the total number of Germans
sterilized under the Nazis range from 300,000 to 400,000.
The Germans were also impressed by
America's immigration laws, which barred people with
hereditary diseases and limited people from non-Nordic
countries. In 1934 the German race anthropologist Hans F. K.
Gunther told an audience at the University of Munich that
American immigration laws should serve as a guideline and
inspiration for Nazi Germany. German race scientists also
admired America's segregation and miscegenation laws. In
fact, Nazi theorists complained that German race policies
lagged behind America's, pointing out that in certain
southern states a person with 1/32 black ancestry was
legally black, while in Germany, if somebody was 1/8 Jewish
or in many instances 1/4 Jewish, that person was considered
legally Aryan.
Americans were the strongest foreign
supporters of Nazi race policies. In 1934 Eugenic News
proclaimed that in "no country of the world is eugenics more
active as an applied science than in Germany" and praised
the Nazi sterilization law as an historic advance. Scores of
American anthropologists, psychologists, psychiatrists, and
geneticists visited Nazi Germany where they had high-level
meetings with Nazi leaders and scientists and visited racial
hygiene institutes, public health departments, and
hereditary health courts. When the Americans returned and
reported on their visits in professional journals and
newsletters, they lauded the German sterilization program.
Like the American Charles Davenport,
Heinrich Himmler, head of the Nazi SS and a main architect
of the Final Solution, began his eugenics education with
animal breeding. His agricultural studies and experience
breeding chickens convinced him that since all behavioral
characteristics are hereditary, the most effective way to
shape the future of a population--human or otherwise--was to
institute breeding projects that favored the desirable and
eliminated the undesirable. Himmler was soon in a position
to apply eugenic principles and methods to human beings in a
way no American eugenicist was ever able to do.
Rudolf Hoss, the commandant of Auschwitz
and another strong supporter of eugenics with a farming
background, wrote in his autobiography after the war that
the original plan for Auschwitz had been to make it into a
major agricultural research station. "All kinds of
stockbreeding was to be pursued there." However, in the
summer of 1941 Himmler summoned him to Berlin to inform him
of the fateful order for the mass extermination of the Jews
of Europe, an order that soon turned Auschwitz into "the
largest human slaughterhouse that history had ever known."
By the summer of 1942 Auschwitz was a vast, full-service
eugenics center for the improvement of animal and human
populations, complete with stockbreeding centers and the
Birkenau extermination camp for the culling of Jews,
Gypsies, and other "sub-humans." Germany's eugenics
campaign entered a new, deadly phase in 1939 when Hitler
issued a secret order for the systematic murder of mentally
retarded, emotionally disturbed, and physically infirm
Germans who were an embarrassment to the myth of Aryan
supremacy.
Once "defective" children were identified
and institutionalized, doctors and nurses either starved
them to death, or gave them lethal doses of luminal (a
sedative), veronal (sleeping pills), morphine, or
scopolamine. The "euthanasia" program--named Operation T4,
or simply T4--transported adults to special killing centers
outfitted with gas chambers. T4 killed between 70,000 and
90,000 Germans before it was officially stopped in August
1941. In 1942, not long after German psychiatrists had sent
the last of their patients to the gas chambers, the
Journal of the American Psychiatric Association
published an article that called for the killing of retarded
children ("nature's mistakes").
The breeding and culling of animals that
was at the center of American and German eugenics produced a
number of key T4 personnel, including those sent to Poland
to operate the death camps. Victor Brack, T4's chief
manager, received a diploma in agriculture from the
Technical University in Munich, while Hans Hefelmann, who
headed the office that coordinated the killing of
handicapped children, had a doctorate in agricultural
economics. Before spending more than two years at the
Hartheim euthanasia center in Austria, Bruno Bruckner had
worked as a porter in a Linz slaughterhouse. Willi Mentz, an
especially sadistic guard at Treblinka, had been in charge
of cows and pigs at two T4 killing centers, Grafeneck and
Hadamar. Treblinka's last commandant, Kurt Franz, trained
with a master butcher before joining the SS. Karl Frenzel,
who worked as a stoker at Hadamar before being posted to the
Sobibor death camp, had also been a butcher. For German
personnel sent to Poland to exterminate Jews, experience in
the exploitation and slaughter of animals proved to be
excellent training.
The exploitation and slaughter of animals
provides the precedent for the mass murder of people and
makes it more likely because it conditions us to withhold
empathy, compassion, and respect from others who are
different. Isaac Bashevis Singer wrote, "There is only one
little step from killing animals to creating gas chambers a
la Hitler." Indeed there is. About the same time the German
Jewish philosopher Theodor Adorno made a similar point:
"Auschwitz begins whenever someone looks at a slaughterhouse
and thinks: they're only animals."
Indeed it does.
Charles Patterson is a social historian, Holocaust
educator, editor, therapist, and author. His first book--Anti-Semitism:
The Road to the Holocaust and Beyond--was called
"important" by Publisher’s Weekly. The National
Council for the Social Studies in Washington, D.C. presented
Patterson with its Carter G. Woodson Book Award for his
biography of Marian Anderson at a special luncheon at its
annual convention in St. Louis, Missouri in 1989. His most
recent book is
Eternal Treblinka: Our
Treatment of Animals and the Holocaust.
For more information on his writings and activities, see his
website:
Eternal Treblinka: Our Treatment of Animals and the
Holocaust: a book.